IUCN Red List species have names that evoke human emotions

The first published work from my PhD research is now out! Check out a brief summary of the paper below on the Please keep to the path blog.

Please keep to the path

Gregg, E. A., Bekessy, S. A., Martin, J. K., Garrard, G. E. Many IUCN red list species have names that evoke negative emotions.Human Dimensions of Wildlife. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10871209.2020.1753132

In a nutshell: Many of the frequently used words in animal common names have high or low sentiment, and some are also associated with human emotions such as anger, fear, disgust and joy. These words may be good targets for strategic name changes to change perceptions and improve engagement with threatened species.

Animal species common names are a key communication tool between researchers, decision-makers and the public. Some of the words used in these common names are unappealing (e.g., rough-skinned horned toad), misleading (e.g., lesser bird of paradise) or even unmemorable (e.g., little grassbird). In this recent paper the authors explore the sentiment of common names and suggest that changing some of these names could be an effective, and inexpensive, way to improve…

View original post 237 more words

How to talk about COVID-19 for conservation professionals

ICON Science

We’re all currently living though a time of uncertainty and personal crisis, so – while I’m sure you’re growing very used to seeing these words at the top of every email – I hope you and your communities are going okay.

Every day our communication and use of language matters, but during a crisis like this, the impact of communication becomes particularly clear.

markus-spiske-wkvAd1cAqsE-unsplash Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

We can all have a positive influence on the language and social discourse around this crisis by being mindful about our own conversations and encouraging thoughtful and strategic communication approaches in our own workplace and community groups.

Below are my recommendations for conservation professionals on how to talk about COVID-19, drawing from my own strategic communications experience and some of the fantastic advice and resources published recently online (see below for links).

Be generous and understanding

People are – at…

View original post 1,620 more words

A waterless barrier could halt cane toad spread in Western Australia

A chance to briefly return to my ecological roots occurred recently with the publication of my Masters paper in Conservation Science and Practice.

This paper tests the on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to halt cane toad spread in Western Australia.

The waterless barrier strategy capitalises on the cane toad’s reliance on artificial water points, specifically within a thin corridor of toad-friendly habitat between Broome and Port Hedland, squeezed between the ocean and the Great Sandy Desert.


Figure 1. Map of the study area. Toads were collected around Kununurra, and transported to Wallal Downs Station in the Kimberley–Pilbara corridor. The invasion front was just southwest of Halls Creek during the time of the study (invasion front, as of 2017, shown as solid black line). Predicted cane toad distribution (based on breeding season length) is shown in grey shades.

During the wet season, toads are expected to move through the corridor landscape without issue. However, during the dry season we expect toads will be reliant on artificial water bodies, such as pastoral dams.

Making these water bodies inaccessible to toads (e.g. by raising troughs and sealing leaks) will make this area inhospitable for toads and therefore prevent their movement across the corridor and into the ecologically and culturally rich Pilbara region. The corridor need only be wide enough (~70km) to account for toad movement during the wet season.

My project was specifically based around testing concerns from stakeholders around assumptions previous simulation modelling had made about the corridor landscape. For example, how could we be sure that cane toads wouldn’t survive the dry season through other means? What about deep goanna burrows, protective coastal vegetation or coastal fogs?

I aimed to directly test these concerns on the ground by translocating and radio-tracking cane toads within the barrier corridor. I did this using male cane toads only to eliminate the possibility of establishing a population ahead of the toad invasion front.


A cane toad with the radio transmitter on. Image: R. Hayes

I then tested the survival, movement rates, and use of shelter sites of toads across two kinds of habitat within the corridor (coastal and desert).

The toads were incredibly adept at finding shelter sites and moved some impressive distances. One particularly speedy toad moved 2.54km in one night! One of the largest single-night movements ever recorded in an anuran!

However, the toads only survived 2-3 days in this landscape, and the maximum predicted survival time was 5 days. In addition, contrary to what we expected, survival was higher in the desert habitat as compared to the coastal habitat.


Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival plots showing survival (i.e., proportion of individuals alive) over time. (a) Overall survival. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. (b) Effect of habitat on survival. * indicates censored points where a lost toad was last seen alive

We largely attribute this survival difference to the availability of shelter sites. The desert habitat was filled with goanna burrows, while the coastal habitat had far fewer and lower quality burrows to shelter in.


Figure 3. Burrows in coastal and desert habitats. (a) Numbers of burrows along six 6 × 100 m transects in each of coastal and desert habitats. Lower and upper hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles, and lower and upper whiskers extend to the smallest and largest values at most 1.5 * inter‐quartile range from the hinge. (b) Typical burrow in desert site. (c) Typical burrow in coastal site. Desert burrows tended to be deeper and appeared to provide higher quality toad shelter compared to coastal burrows. Images: R. Hayes

Ultimately this work provides further evidence to support the waterless barrier strategy, suggesting it may indeed be an effective and inexpensive method by which to prevent the cane toad’s impact on species in the ecologically and culturally valuable Pilbara region.

You can read more about my personal experience of this fieldwork on the ground on my science writing blog here.

Gregg, EA., Phillips, BP., Tingley, R. (2019) The on-ground feasibility of a waterless barrier to stop the spread of invasive cane toads in Western Australia. Conservation Science and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.74


Internship at Arid Recovery

I’m hoping to start on some posts for this blog in the near future, but in the meantime I would love to share some photos and experiences from my internship at Arid Recovery in the first half of 2017.

Arid Recovery is an independent, not-for-profit conservation initiative which has been working just outside Roxby Downs since 1997. The reserve incorporates 123 km² of fenced reserve with about half being feral-free (i.e. free of cats, foxes, and rabbits). The reserve has successfully reintroduced populations of the Burrowing Bettong, Greater Stick-nest rat, Western Barred Bandicoot, and Greater Bilby. Plains mice and Spinifex Hopping Mice have also reintroduced themselves (!) reaching astounding numbers.

BeFunky Collage.jpg

The Big 4 at Arid Recovery: (L-R) the Greater Stick-nest Rat, Burrowing Bettong, Greater Bilby, and Western Barred Bandicoot, shown through camera trap images. Photos: Arid Recovery

My fellow intern Nathan Beerkens (now Field Ecologist & Community Coordinator!), wrote a stellar post describing A Day in the Life of an Arid Recovery intern, which will give you a good idea of what kind of work we were doing day-to-day. Basically lots of camera trap checks, community engagement, and work on individual projects, which for me involved even more camera trap footage and staking out some rabbit warrens outside the reserve fence.

We were also lucky enough to help out during the annual pitfall trapping, which was a massive highlight for me, as a reptile-lover with little hands-on experience until that point. I wrote a post on that incredible week on Arid Recovery’s blog which you can find here.


Some seriously charismatic reptile species on the Arid Recovery reserve: (L-R) Bearded Dragon, Sand Goanna, Fat-tailed Gecko)

Many late nights were spent spotlighting both within and outside the reserve, often with the wonderful Hugh McGregor. This occasionally included playing around with a thermal camera I became increasingly obsessed with. Another particularly valuable experience for me was running group tours to the reserve, which incorporated such taxing work as watching sunsets, drawing attention to exciting tracks and nests, and spotlighting for the Big 4 (as pictured in the camera traps above).

My obsession with the arid environment was fully cemented by the tracks in the sand.  What appears to be a relatively desolate landscape suddenly seems near to bursting when you realise the ground is covered by signs of life. The excitement that comes from identifying tracks cannot be understated, and it was particularly thrilling to come across bilby tracks! (Although I also find sleepy / stumpy-tail / shingleback lizard tracks to be pretty spectacular).


Tracks within the landscape at Arid Recovery: (L-R) Burrowing Bettong tracks, Shingleback/Sleepy/Stumpy-tail Lizard tracks, mess of tracks including Plains and Hopping Mice

Nearing the end of the internship, my semi-severe peanut allergy unfortunately counted me out of annual bettong trapping (but see a blog and video about it here). However, the extraordinarily awesome silver lining was that I ended up catching bilbies instead! It was so incredible to see these marvellous creatures up close, and a wonderful experience to bring the internship to a close.

Since leaving I’ve already returned to volunteer on some vegetation surveys, and I plan to return for pitfall trapping this year if I can. It goes without saying that I recommend you take a visit to catch a glimpse of the “Big 4” (stickies, bettongs, bilbies, and bandicoots). I also suggest, if possible, that you take a careful look both inside and outside the fence to see for yourself the striking difference in the animal (in the tracks) and plant communities, resulting from feral predator exclusion.

I would like to thank all the staff at Arid Recovery, particularly Kath, Kim, John, Hugh, and Nathan for such a wonderful experience and a great time!